ERLING KNUD OVE HANSEN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1971-04-15
No. O-26
JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
247 So. 2d 18 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Steinhauser v. State, 228 So.2d 446 (Fla.App.1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Erling Knud Ove Hansen, Jr. v. State, 420 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
    …d because in June 1970 Hansen filed a motion for post-cónviction relief, alleging the same or similar ground as that alleged in the motion under consideration, which the trial court denied and upon appeal to this Court was affirmed. Hansen v. State, 247 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Hansen is not entitled to file a second post-conviction motion alleging the same ground as the previously disposed of motion. Williams v. State, 392 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). AFFIRMED. ERVIN and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.…
  • Cnty. OF Dade v. Eleanora A. G. Callahan, 259 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
    …v. State, Fla.1969, 225 So. 2d 321; Gay v. City of Orlando, Fla.App. 1967, 202 So. 2d 896; and City of Piqua v. Hinger, 15 Ohio St.2d 110, 238 N.E. 2d 766 (1968). Cf. State v. Mitchell, Fla.1971, 245 So. 2d 618; and State v. Liefert, Fla. App. 1971, 247 So. 2d 18. In State v. Pyle, 19 Ohio St.2d 64, 249 N.E. 2d 826 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1007, 90 S.Ct. 561, 24 L.Ed.2d 498 (1970), [*507] the Supreme Court of Ohio held that Miranda warnings do not apply in an offense where the defendant was charged an…
  • Woodward v. Duval Motor Co., 391 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
    …State, 378 So. 2d 281 (Fla.1979); Sambrine v. State, 386 So. 2d 546 (Fla.1980). And, if the driver refuses consent, he must suffer the sanction of having his license suspended for the statutory period. Sambrine v. State, supra. . State v. Liefert, 247 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), without discussing the statute, held admissible such results even in the absence of any determination whether they were for the declared purpose of completing an accident report, as required by the statute. . Precisely what Coff…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw