LADY

v.

OUTBOARD MARINE CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Waffle House, Inc., 534 U.S. 279 (U.S. 2002)
  …e relief in federal court, but precluding monetary relief); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Nixon, 210 F. 3d 814 (CA8), cert. denied, 531 U. S. 958 (2000) (same). We granted the EEOC’s petition for certiorari to resolve this conflict, 532 U. S. 941 (2001), and now reverse. II Congress has directed the EEOC to exercise the same enforcement powers, remedies, and procedures that are set forth in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it is enforcing the ADA’s prohibitions against employ…
• Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51 (U.S. 2002)
  …to provide a propeller guard were impliedly pre-empted by the FBSA; Outboard Marine, the successor to Neal Glaser Marine, declared bankruptcy shortly after the petition for certiorari was filed), cert. denied sub nom. Lady v. Outboard Marine Corp., 532 U. S. 941 (2001). Brunswick has asserted that federal maritime law governs this case. Because this argument was not raised below, it is waived. The Senate Report on the 1971 Act observed that approximately 40 million Americans engaged in recreational boatin…
• Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta, 534 U.S. 103 (U.S. 2001)
  …d local DBE program now operates, that program passed constitutional muster under Adarand I. 228 F. 3d, at 1176-1187. We again granted certiorari to decide whether the Court of Appeals misapplied the strict scrutiny standard announced in Adarand I. 532 U. S. 941 (2001). We anticipated that we would be able to review the same “relevant program” that was addressed by the Court of Appeals.1 But since certiorari was granted there has been a shift in the posture of the case that precludes such review. Both part…