IN RE DECARO; IN RE NANCE; AND IN RE MCCOWIN

Citator

Cited By

• Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 (U.S. 2002)
  …wn,” 240 F. 3d, at 355-356. Concluding that petitioner had not demonstrated adverse effect, id., at 360, it affirmed the District Court’s denial of habeas relief. We [*166] granted a stay of execution of petitioner’s sentence and granted certiorari. 532 U. S. 970 (2001). II The Sixth Amendment provides that a criminal defendant shall have the right to “the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” This right has been accorded, we have said, “not for its own sake, but because of the effect it has on the abili…
• Toyota Motor Mfg. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (U.S. 2002)
  …need to determine whether respondent had been substantially limited in the major life activities of lifting or working, ibid., or whether she had had a “record of” a disability or had been “regarded as” disabled, id., at 844. We granted certiorari, 532 U. S. 970 (2001), to consider the proper standard for assessing whether an individual is substantially limited in performing manual tasks. We now reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision to grant partial summary judgment to respondent on the issue of whether sh…
• Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. Coke, 551 U.S. 158 (U.S. 2007)
  …d to meet the “‘same requirements’” as States with respect to judicial review of Clean Air Act permitting actions, but then adopted a final rule that exempted tribes from certain, though not all, requirements), cert. denied sub nom. Michigan v. EPA, 532 U. S. 970 (2001). Neither can we find any significant legal problem with the Department’s explanation for the change. The agency said that it had “concluded that these exemptions can be available to such third party employers” because that interpretation is…