AMAVISCA

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Bailey v. Gulf Coast Transp., Inc., 280 F.3d 1333 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …provides to employees for violations of the FLSA’s antiretaliation provision are broader than those available for violations of the wage and overtime provisions. Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts, Inc., 208 F. 3d 928, 933-34 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 975, 121 S.Ct. 1609, 149 L.Ed.2d 474 (2001). One significant difference between the remedies available for violations of the wage and overtime provisions and the antiretaliation provision is the availability of equitable relief. For violations of the…
• Scrivens v. Phillip Scott Mgmt. & Invs. LLC (M.D. Fla. 2025)
  …r unpaid overtime compensation . . . and in an additional equal amount as liquidated damages."). The liquidated damages under the FLSA are "compensatory in nature." Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts, Inc., 208 F.3d 928, 934 (11th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 975 (2001). Thus, “the liquidated damage provision is not penal in its nature but constitutes compensation for the retention of a workman's pay which might result in damages too obscure and difficult of proof of estimate other than by liquidated damages…