EZORAL WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1971-04-20
No. 70-1212
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
247 So. 2d 93 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Topics
Anders V. California Procedure Frivolous Appeal

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Nelson v. State, 281 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
    …, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178. . Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199. . Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 224. . Whitney v. State, Fla.App.1966, 184 So. 2d 207; Chisholm v. State, Fla.App.1971, 247 So. 2d 93.…
  • Doerr v. State, 275 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973)
    …t reporter’s transcript of the proceedings at the time of entering the plea. As to this ground, the court correctly determined that it was duplicitous. For this reason the court was not required to again consider it. Chisholm v. State, Fla.App.1971, 247 So. 2d 93. The second ground of the motion was denial of effective assistance of counsel, a ground not theretofore asserted in prior motions. With one exception, the factual allegations in support of this ground were totally insufficient to show ineffective…
  • Williams v. State, 557 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …es substantially the same issues as those contained in Williams’ first motion for post-conviction relief and is therefore proeedurally barred. Delap v. State, 513 So. 2d 1050 (Fla.1987); Booker v. State, 503 So. 2d 888 (Fla.1987); Chisholm v. State, 247 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order denying the requested relief. \ Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw