HAYES

v.

MILLS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Linroy Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 2002)
  …capital felony in Florida. This Court, however, expressly held otherwise in Mills v. Moore, 786 So. 2d 532, 538 (Fla.) ("[TJhere can be no doubt that a person convicted of a capital felony faces a maximum possible penalty of death.”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1015, 121 S.Ct. 1752, 149 L.Ed.2d 673 (2001). . Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). . The Apprendi issue had also been raised in other Florida capital cases that were stayed by the United States Supreme Court p…
• Amos Lee King v. Moore, 831 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 2002)
  …capital felony in Florida. This Court, however, expressly held otherwise in Mills v. Moore, 786 So. 2d 532, 538 (Fla.) ("[T]here can be no doubt that a person convicted of a capital felony faces a maximum possible penalty of death.”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1015, 121 S.Ct. 1752, 149 L.Ed.2d 673 (2001). . Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). . The Apprendi issue had also been raised in other Florida capital cases that were stayed by the United States Supreme Court p…
• Amos Lee King v. State, 808 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 2002)
  …sixth contention, that Apprendi applies to Florida’s capital sentencing statute and the maximum sentence under the statute is death, has been decided adversely to King’s position. See Mills v. Moore, 786 So. 2d 532, 537-38 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1015, 121 S.Ct. 1752, 149 [*1246] L.Ed.2d 673 (2001); see also Brown v. Moore, 800 So. 2d 223 (Fla.2001) (rejecting claims that aggravating circumstances are required to be charged in indictment, submitted to jury during guilt phase, and found by unanimo…