ROBINSON
v.
ALBRIGHT ET AL.
ROBINSON
ALBRIGHT ET AL.
532 U.S. 1022
Supreme Court of the United States (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rivera v. State, 917 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…uards essential to a fair trial). Drug or alcohol tests performed in the usual course of hospital business are admissible in criminal cases under the business records exception. See Baber v. State, 775 So. 2d 258, 260-261 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1022, 121 S.Ct. 1964, 149 L.Ed.2d [*212] 758 (2001) (stating that “[t]he majority rule among state courts is that drug or alcohol tests performed in the usual course of business of a hospital are admissible in criminal cases” because if they are presumed…
-
Laws v. State, 145 So. 3d 937 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)…er error had occurred). In 2000, the supreme court answered a certified question from the Fourth District 1 establishing that records of hospital blood tests can be admitted in DUI cases. See Baber v. State, 775 So. 2d 258 (Fla.2000), cert, denied, 532 U.S. 1022,121 S.Ct. 1964, 149 L.Ed.2d 758 (2001). After the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), the predicate steps necessary to introduce such evidence arguably might be more…