COOK ET UX.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Hittson v. GDCP Warden, 759 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2014)
  …for reconsideration, asking the high court to consider the Estelle claims in light of Nance. The Supreme Court summarily denied the motion in January 2001, and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari review in May 2001, Hittson v. Turpin, 532 U.S. 1052, 121 S.Ct. 2193, 149 L.Ed.2d 1025 (2001). III. A. In January 2002, Hittson petitioned the United States District Court for the Mid-die District of Georgia for a writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, setting aside his convictions and…
• Winck v. England, 327 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …]hat we really determine is a judicial policy akin to comity,” Mindes v. Seaman, 453 F. 2d 197, 199 (5th Cir.1971), that is, a “judicial abstention doctrine.” Meister v. Tex. Adjutant General’s Dep’t, 233 F. 3d 332, 339 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1052, 121 S.Ct. 2194, 149 L.Ed.2d 1025 (2001). As such, “we view the requirement of exhaustion as ... based on principles of comity and not as an imperative limitation of the scope of federal habeas corpus power.” In re Kelly, 401 F. 2d 211, 213 (5th C…