NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
v.
LERMAN ET AL.
NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
LERMAN ET AL.
533 U.S. 915
Supreme Court of the United States (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., 535 U.S. 722 (U.S. 2002)…ng patentees. Judge Michel, in his dissent, described in detail how the complete bar required the Court of Appeals to disregard 8 older decisions of this Court, as well as more than 50 of its own cases. 234 F. 3d, at 601-616. We granted certiorari. 533 U. S. 915 (2001). II The patent laws “promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts” by rewarding innovation with a temporary monopoly. U. S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 8. The monopoly is a property right; and like any property right, its boundaries should…