PAYNE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Windom v. State, 886 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 2004)
  …t Apprendi errors are “structural” and have applied harmless-error analysis to Apprendi claims. See, e.g., Coleman, 329 F. 3d at 89-90; Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F. 3d at 670; United States v. Candelario, 240 F. 3d 1300, 1307 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 922, 121 S.Ct. 2535, 150 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001); United States v. Nance, 236 F. 3d 820, 825-26 (7th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 832, 122 S.Ct. 79, 151 L.Ed.2d 43 (2001). . See Florida Department of Corrections, Death Row Fact Sheet, available at http…
• United States v. Miles, 290 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …. We reject Miles’ Apprendi claim. Because Miles raised the argument under Apprendi at sentencing, he made a timely constitutional objection that we review de novo. United States v. Candelario, 240 F. 3d 1300, 1303-06 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 922, 121 S.Ct. 2535, 150 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001). The Supreme Court established in Almendarez-Torres v. United States that a defendant's prior conviction is merely a sentencing factor that does not have to be submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reaso…
• United States v. Romano, 314 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …the error is plain, (3) affects the defendant’s substantial rights, and (4) seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings. United States v. Candelario, 240 F. 3d 1300, 1308-09 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 922, 121 S.Ct. 2535, 150 L.Ed.2d 705 (2001). The Government properly concedes that appellant was denied the entire benefit of his plea agreement because it breached the agreement when the prosecutor strongly endorsed the probation officer’s recommenda…