RONALD GENE PALMER, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, MRS. JAMES MAHER, HIS MOTHER, RELATOR,
v.
ALL JUDGES OF THE 19TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
RONALD GENE PALMER, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, MRS. JAMES MAHER, HIS MOTHER, RELATOR,
ALL JUDGES OF THE 19TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
247 So. 2d 477
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
On the basis of the briefs, the Petition for Prohibition, and the response thereto, we conclude that the rule nisi was improvidently entered and the writ of prohibition must be denied. See Kent v. United States, 1966, 383 U.S. 541, 86 S.Ct. 1045, 1057, 16 L.Ed.2d 84, and State of Florida ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Booher, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 720, 722.
Prohibition is denied and the rule nisi discharged.
CROSS, C. J., and REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilensky v. Fields, 267 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1972)…ERVIN, Justice. The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, having certified to us that its decision in the case of Fields v. Wilensky, 247 So. 2d 477, passes upon a question of great public interest, and a petition for writ of certiorari having been filed, we have jurisdiction of this cause under Article V, Section 4(2), Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The question certified to this Court is as fol…
Authorities Cited
- Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 (U.S. 1966)
- Simonet v. Simonet, 241 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)
- State of Fla. ex rel. Philip S. Shailer v. Hon. Stephen R. Booher, 241 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)