CLYDE JOYNER, APPELLANT,

v.

DOROTHY JOYNER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• State Dep't OF Revenue v. Anderson, 403 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 1981)
  …contrary to a later-asserted position; 2) reliance on that representation; and 3) a change in position detrimental to the party claiming estoppel, caused by the representation and reliance thereon. Greenhut Construction Co. v. Henry A. Knott, Inc., 247 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). Anderson failed to show the existence of these elements. If anything, the record demonstrates that Anderson knew, at least by the time of receiving the [*401] refund in 1974, that registration as a dealer and tender of a resale…
• Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. S.A.P., 835 So. 2d 1091 (Fla. 2002)
  …held to be subject to equitable considerations. Finally, I cannot find North American Co. v. Green, 120 So. 2d 603 (Fla.1960), State Department of Revenue v. Anderson, 403 So. 2d 397 (Fla.1981), and Greenhut Construction Co. v. Henry A. Knott Inc., 247 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971), relating to the principle that “equitable estoppel can effectively be applied against the state only in rare and exceptional circumstances,” applicable here. My reading of these cases reveals that all are distinguishable and tot…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Dep't OF Revenue v. Hobbs, 368 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …s to some material fact, (2) a reliance upon the representation by the party claiming the estop-pel and (3) a change in such party’s position, caused by his reliance upon the representation to his detriment. Greenhut Construction Co., Inc. v. Knott, 247 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).…