PURCELL ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Chittakone Chanthasouxat, 342 F.3d 1271 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …or probable came to stop the Defendants’ vehicle. i. Reasonableness and the Fourth Amendment “The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable search and seizure.” United States v. Purcell, 236 F. 3d 1274, 1277 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 830, 122 S.Ct. 73, 151 L.Ed.2d 38 (2001); see U.S. Const, amend. IV. However, a traffic stop is a constitutional detention if it is justified by reasonable suspicion under Terry or probable cause to believe a traffic violation has occurred under Whren…
• Gill v. P.J. Mecusker, 633 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2011)
  …m concluding that the summary nature of a state court’s decision does not lessen the deference that it is due. See Sellan v. Kuhlman, 261 F. 3d 303, 310-12 (2d Cir.2001); Bell v. Jarvis, 236 F. 3d 149, 158-62 (4th Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 830, 122 S.Ct. 74, 151 L.Ed.2d 39 (2001); Harris v. Stovall, 212 F. 3d 940, 943 n. 1 (6th Cir.2000); Aycox v. Lytle, 196 F. 3d 1174, 1177-78 (10th Cir.1999); James v. Bowersox, 187 F. 3d 866, 869 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1143, 120 S.Ct. 99…
• United States v. Jackson, 548 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (M.D. Fla. 2008)