JACK FINEBERG AND IRVING FINEBERG, APPELLANTS,
v.
PHILLIP BROOKS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1971-05-11
No. 70-763
Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.
247 So. 2d 763 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant has asked that we review the evidence in view of his point on appeal that the evidence before the jury was not sufficient to sustain the verdict. In accordance with appellant’s argument, we have done as requested and find that the testimony and evidence submitted together with the reasonable inferences therefrom were sufficient to support the verdict.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • G. H. Crawford Co. Fin. Servs. v. Goch, 292 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
    …ese matters in order that complainant might commence an action against the defendant-appellants. In response thereto, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. That motion was denied and the denial thereof was affirmed on appeal (Fla.App., 247 So. 2d 763). Thereafter, defendants filed an answer and discovery began. In October 1973, plaintiff filed a request for the production of certain books and records of G. H. Crawford Company and an accounting regarding its purchase of Highlands County Title and…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw