RAJI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Mitchel Kalmanson v. Lockett, 848 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …tion. As an amendment of the complaint would have been futile, there was no need in this instance to allow another opportunity. See Doe v. America Online, Inc., 718 So. 2d 385, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved, 783 So. 2d 1010 (Fla.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 891, 122 S.Ct. 208, 151 L.Ed.2d 148 (2001) (complaint could not be amended to overcome immunity). CONCLUSION No trial has been held to determine if the actions of Judge Lockett alleged in the complaint actually occurred. If they did, it is difficult t…
• United States v. Gomez, 323 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …(7th Cir.1989); Charmer, 711 F. 2d at 1175. We review a district court's disclosure of grand jury materials for an abuse of discretion. United Kingdom v. United States, 238 F. 3d 1312, 1319-21 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, Raji v. United States, 534 U.S. 891, 122 S.Ct. 206, 151 L.Ed.2d 146 (2001). . The "compelling need” test is consistent with our requirements for disclosing grand jury materials. "Parties seeking grand jury materials 'must show that the material they seek is needed to avoid a possible…