THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
MARTIN LEMLICH, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court approved the Referee's recommendations for disciplinary measures against the attorney.
Respondent attorney was found guilty of failing to file employer's quarterly federal tax returns and served a prison sentence. The Florida Bar filed a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Bar cases and more on FLexlaw
This is a disciplinary proceeding against a member of the Florida Bar, Martin Lem-lich. Mr. Lemlich did not request review by this Court.
On April 16, 1969 Respondent was found guilty of willfully and knowingly failing to file employer’s quarterly federal tax returns. He was sentenced to sixty days’ imprisonment to be followed by a two-year probation. The prison term has been served.
The Florida Bar filed a complaint charging him with violating the provisions of the Integration Rule of the Florida Bar, Canons 29 and 32 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, and Rules 30 and 32 of the Additional Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys in Florida, 32 F.S.A. In his Answer, Respondent admitted all the allegations of the complaint. The brief hearing involved testimony only on the subject of appropriate disciplinary measures.
The Referee concluded “that the respondent be found guilty of misconduct justifying disciplinary measures,” and adopted the Florida Bar’s recommendation that Respondent be given a public reprimand. He also recommended that costs in the amount of $64 be taxed against him.
The Referee’s recommendations are hereby approved. Respondent is directed to bear the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $64; publication of this opinion shall constitute sufficient reprimand.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (34 total)
-
Regency INN v. Johnson, 422 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…bandon that element of the well settled standard for capacity to earn which takes into account “[ijnability to obtain work of a type which claimant can perform in light of his after-injury condition,” Walker v. Electronic Products & Engineering Co., 248 So. 2d 161, 163 (Fla.1971). We find, accordingly, that the rule stated in LeHigh and its progeny should not govern the evaluation of work search standards for wage loss, and the award by the deputy in this case is therefore affirmed. ERVIN, SHIVERS and WENTW…
-
Flesche v. Interstate Warehouse & U. S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 411 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…the open labor market after having reached maximum medical improvement.” However, there are a number of criteria by which wage-earning capacity must be measured, and “no single factor is conclusive.” Walker v. Electronic Products & Engineering Co., 248 So. 2d 161, 163 (Fla.1971). Of course, claimant’s physical or mental condition may be such that the absence of a job search is reasonable and justified. Chicken-'N'-Things v. Murray, 329 So. 2d 302 (Fla.1976); Sizemore v. Canaveral Port Authority, 332 So. 2d 2…
-
Vesta Mae Brown v. S. S. Kresge Co., Inc., 305 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1974)…aluated at this time due to her lack of [*195] employment or attempts to obtain employment.” (Emphasis supplied.) Petitioner urges as to her wage earning capacity loss that the criteria expressed in Walker v. Electronics Products & Engineering Co., 248 So. 2d 161 (Fla.1971), should he applied herein; namely, the extent of physical impairment; claimant’s age, industrial history, and education; inability to obtain work of a type claimant can perform in light of her after-injury condition, wages earned after in…
Previewing 3 of 34 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence