SHARRIEF ET UX.
v.
GERLACH

U.S. | 2001-10-09
No. 01-159
534 U.S. 950 Supreme Court of the United States (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Ettinger, 344 F.3d 1149 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …in determining the admissibility of a prior consistent statement under Fed. R.Evid. 801(d)(1)(B) and will not be reversed absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion.” United States v. Prieto, 232 F. 3d 816, 819 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 950, 122 S.Ct. 345, 151 L.Ed.2d 260 (2001). Ettinger argues that the district court erred in allowing the introduction of Barnes’s testimony about the statement he gave the FBI agent. This argument fails. The plain language of Rule 801(d)(1)(B) state…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw