GEORGE P. COLEMAN, ET AL.,
v.
J. C. JOHNSON; GEORGE P. COLEMAN, ET AL., V. JOHN ZIEGLER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court recalled its mandate in two consolidated mortgage cases to correct the allocation of appellate costs. The Court had previously reversed and remanded the lower court's decision, but initially taxed all costs against both appellees jointly without apportionment, which the Court corrected to allocate costs equally between the two appellees.
The Court ordered the mandate amended to prorate costs by taxing one-half of the appellate costs against J.C. Johnson's estate and one-half against John Ziegler, with transcript costs to be apportioned equitably by the lower court so each appellee bears only its just share.
“all the costs were taxed against the appellees without prorating said costs”
Describes the original improper allocation of costs in the mandate that prompted the recall
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTwo mortgage cases were consolidated involving the same property. J.C. Johnson and John Ziegler were plaintiffs in separate cases below, while George …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mortgagee'S Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
The above entitled two cases were consolidated in the court below for the purpose of taking testimony and for entry of final decree. The final decree appealed from was brought here for consideration on one transcript of record.
J. C. Johnson was the plaintiff in one of the cases below and John Ziegler was plaintiff in the other and George P. Coleman and wife were the defendants in both cases. These two cas'es involved two mortgages on the same property.
On March 7, 1939, this Court rendered its opinion and decision reversing the decree of the lower court and remanding the cause for further proceedings not inconsistent with said opinion. In the mandate which went down, all *688the costs were taxed against the appellees without prorating said costs.
On May 30, 1939, J. C. Johnson, Jr., as administrator of the estate of J. C. Johnson, Sr., filed a motion for re-taxing of costs in which he recited that J. C. Johnson, Jr., died on November 5, 1938, and contended that no costs whatever should be assessed against his administrator for two reasons': first that J. C. Johnson died prior to the date the judgment was entered; second, that while it may not have been the legal duty of Coleman to pay the J. C. Johnson mortgage out of the $500 going to the two lodges as the purchase price payment on the property, still no covenant of warranty in a deed of conveyance given by a mortgagee to a vendee can defeat the right of a mortgagee to subject it to a property mortgage upon a failure of the mortgagor or his heirs or assigns to pay the same. This contention was' dealt with in the court’s decision on the merits of the appeal.
It is also stated that neither J. C. Johnson, Sr., or his attorney were ever notified of the date set for oral argument in the above entitled cause, nor does the name of the attorney for J. C. Johnson appear in the report of the opinion in said consolidated cause.
Appellee John Ziegler also filed a petition for the recalling of the mandate and the taxing of the costs against appellant, for various reas'ons.
The mandate which was handed down in this cause made no provision for prorating the costs in each case but all costs were taxed against the appellees jointly.
Upon consideration of these petitions the Court recalled the mandate for the purpose of consideration of and acting upon s'aid petitions.
Upon consideration thereof it is ordered that the mandate be corrected and amended so as to tax one-half of the *689costs incurred in this Court against the appellee J. C. Johnson, Jr., as administrator of the estate of J. C. Johnson, deceased, and the other half against appellee John C. Ziegler, and that the costs of the preparation and making of the trans'cript of record reasonably incurred shall be taxed in the lower court against the appellees in such proportionate amounts against each appellee as in the opinion of the lower court is equitable and just, so that each appellee shall be liable only for his just share of such costs. This is' authorized by Rule 24 of this Court as adopted January 12, 1939.
Done and ordered this 23rd day of June, A. D. 1939.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Terrell, C. J., concurs in- order and judgment.
Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Al Martel v. Carlson, 118 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)…total amount of the costs is improper, inasmuch as one plaintiff would thereupon be liable for the entire amount of the costs. It is proper under such circumstances to apportion the costs between the unsuccessful plaintiffs. See Coleman v. Johnson, 138 Fla. 687, 190 So. 11. The appellee agrees with the appellants that the costs were not taxed in this case upon a motion and hearing. The affidavit of costs on behalf of the defendant showing a claimed expenditure of $344.-11, does not reveal that the affidav…