LINDAMOOD
v.
OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY

U.S. | 2001-11-13
No. 01-436
534 U.S. 1021 Supreme Court of the United States (2001) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Vittor, 323 F.3d 930 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …es association,” that is, the rules of an SRO. By permitting the SRO’s to bring original actions to enforce their rules, section 21(f) promotes efficiency in preserving the SEC’s resources. Otto v. SEC, 253 F. 3d 960, 964 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1021, 122 S.Ct. 548, 151 L.Ed.2d 425 (2001) (stating that “because the SEC lacks the resources to police the entire securities industry, it relies on participants in the markets to govern themselves”). Accordingly, we hold that section 21(f) does not ap…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw