ANNE MATTISON AKERS
v.
L. O. CORBETT; HOWARD R. CORBETT, INTERVENOR

Fla. | 1939-06-23
Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur., Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment., Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of-1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
138 Fla. 737 Florida Supreme Court (1939) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 190 So. 31
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Per Cur.am. —

Per Cur.am. —

This cause having been submitted upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, all of which have been duly considered, it is ordered that the order of the court below be, and the same is, hereby reversed upon authority of the case of Anne Mattison Akers v. L. O. Corbett, et al., this' day decided. (Page 730 of this Report:)

Reversed.

So ordered.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of-1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Robinson v. Fla. Dry Cleaning & Laundry Bd., 141 Fla. 899 (Fla. 1940)
    …Cleaning & Laundry Board v. Everglades Laundry, 137 Fla. 290, 188 So. 380; State ex rel Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board v. Atkinson, 136 Fla. 528, 188 So. 834; Economy Cash & Carry Cleaners v. Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board, 138 Fla. 642, 190 So. 31; Florida Dry Cleaning & Laundry Board v. Everglades Laundry, 138 Fla. 646, 190 So. 33. It is contended on this record that the grounds or reasons assigned for the unconstitutionality of Chapter 17894, supra, were not presented and were not considere…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw