BELL, WARDEN

v.

CONE

Citator

Cited By

• Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685 (U.S. 2002)
  …979. The state court’s adjudication of respondent’s Sixth Amendment claim, in the Court of Appeals’ analysis, was therefore an unreasonable application of the clearly established law announced in Strickland. 243 F. 3d, at 979. We granted certiorari, 534 U. S. 1064 (2001), and now reverse the Court of Appeals. II The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 modified a federal habeas court’s role in reviewing state prisoner applications in order to prevent federal habeas “retrials” and to ensure…
• Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545 (U.S. 2002)
  …2001); United States v. Carlson, 217 F. 3d 986, 989 (CA8 2000); United States v. Pounds, 230 F. 3d 1317, 1319 (CA11 2000). The court also held that the constitutional argument was foreclosed by McMillan. 243 F. 3d, at 809. We granted certiorari, 534 U. S. 1064 (2001), and now affirm. II We must first answer a threshold question of statutory construction: Did Congress make brandishing an element or a sentencing factor in § 924(c)(1)(A)? In the Government’s view the text in question defines a single crime…
• Christopher v. Harbury, 536 U.S. 403 (U.S. 2002)
  …t officials petitioned for review of the court’s holding as to the claim of denial of access to courts, but Harbury did not cross-petition on the other Bivens claims, leaving the Bivens access claim6 the sole matter before us. We granted certiorari, 534 U. S. 1064 (2001), because of the importance of this issue to the Government in its conduct of the Nation’s foreign affairs, and now reverse. Ill A This Court’s prior cases on denial of access to courts have not extended over the entire range of claims that…