CROMPTON CO./CIE, FKA UNIROYAL CHEMICAL LTD.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Torrealba, 339 F.3d 1238 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …on some ambiguous word or phrase. Adler v. Duval County Sch. Bd., 206 F. 3d 1070, 1087 (11th Cir.1999), vac. on other grounds, 531 U.S. 801, 121 S.Ct. 31, 148 L.Ed.2d 3 (2000), and opinion reinstated, 250 F. 3d 1330 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1065, 122 S.Ct. 664, 151 L.Ed.2d 579 (2001). No restriction is placed on the use of the application notes and, in fact, exactly the contrary is true — the guideline and the commentary must be “read together.” See, e.g., United States v. Pedragh, 225 F.…
• A.I.G. Uruguay Compania de Seguros, S.A. v. AAA Cooper Transp., 334 F.3d 997 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …ent cause for doing so, we will not reform the contract between two such parties. See Buce v. Allianz Life Ins. Co., 247 F. 3d 1133, 1150 (11th Cir.) (“[T]he parties to a contract have the right to define the terms of that contract.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1065, 122 S.Ct. 666, 151 L.Ed.2d 580 (2001); FMC Fin. Corp. v. Murphree, 632 F. 2d 413, 420 (5th Cir.1980) (recognizing under Illinois law that the courts “are reluctant to re-write the terms of a negotiated contract between businessmen”). The trial cou…