TUCKER
v.
MAYNARD, DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
TUCKER
MAYNARD, DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
534 U.S. 1073
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730 (U.S. 2002)…d 318 (CA11 1987), and Gates v. Collier, 501 F. 2d 1291 (CA5 1974) — “[tjhough analogous,” were not “ ‘materially similar’ to Hope’s situation.’ ” 240 F. 3d, at 981. We granted certio-rari to review the Eleventh Circuit’s qualified immunity holding. 534 U. S. 1073 (2002). II The threshold inquiry a court must undertake m a qualified immunity analysis is whether plaintiff’s allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation. Saucier v. Katz, 533 U. S. 194, 201 (2001). The Court of Appeals held that “…
-
City OF Columbus v. Ours Garage & Wrecker Serv., Inc., 536 U.S. 424 (U.S. 2002)…ocal safety and insurance regulations are preempted), with Ace Auto Body & Towing, Ltd. v. New York, 171 F. 3d 765 (CA2 1999) (holding that local safety and insurance regulations are not preempted). We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict, see 534 U. S. 1073 (2002), and now reverse the Sixth Circuit’s judgment. II We begin our consideration of the question presented with an observation that is beyond genuine debate. Had 49 U. S. C. § 14501(c) contained no reference at all to “political subdivision's]…
-
Franconia Assocs. v. United States, 536 U.S. 129 (U.S. 2002)…ners’ contract claims for the reasons it had dismissed the claims of the Franconia petitioners. 46 Fed. Cl. 629, 633-635 (2000). The Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion. Judgt. order reported at 7 Fed. Appx. 928 (2001).7 We granted certiorari, 534 U. S. 1073 (2002), and now reverse the two judgments of the Federal Circuit before us for review. [*141] II A A waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States “cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.” United States v. King, 395 U. S. 1,…