COCKERHAM
v.
UNITED STATES
COCKERHAM
UNITED STATES
534 U.S. 1085
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Polite v. State, 933 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…re a particular element of knowledge as an element of the crime. The two concepts, however, seem quite interchangeable and indistinguishable for purposes of analysis and result. See United States v. Kimes, 246 F. 3d 800 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1085, 122 S.Ct. 823, 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002); United States v. Berki, 936 F. 2d 529, 532 (11th Cir.l991)("[W]e conclude that [threatening to assault or murder a federal judge] is not a specific intent crime. In other words, it was not essential for [the d…
-
Brinson v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr., 266 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)
-
Hardwick v. Crosby, 320 F.3d 1127 (11th Cir. 2003)…f the murder. Thus, this case is distinguished from other death-penalty cases where the petitioner's use of drugs and/or alcohol at the time of the murder was either exaggerated, Brown v. Jones, 255 F. 3d 1273, 1278-79 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1085, 122 S.Ct. 823, 151 L.Ed.2d 705 (2002), or not credible, Duren v. Hopper, 161 F. 3d 655, 661-62 (11th Cir.1998). . 3.850 Proceeding at 309. After interviewing Hardwick in 1985, Dr. Barnard determined that Hardwick was competent to stand trial and t…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence