J. M. LEE, STATE COMPTROLLER,
v.
PASCO COUNTY AND THE BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION FOR PASCO COUNTY

Fla. | 1939-06-27
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur., Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment., Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
138 Fla. 750 Florida Supreme Court (1939)
Also reported at: 190 So. 25

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Comptroller appealed an order that denied his motion to dismiss a lawsuit seeking to approve a compromise settlement for past-due county and school taxes. The court found that the county boards lacked statutory authority to compromise these taxes and reversed the lower court's decision.


Holding

No, the court held that in the absence of valid statutory authority, the county boards could not compromise past-due taxes. Therefore, the denial of the Comptroller's motion to dismiss was in error.


Key Quotes

“In the absence of valid statutory authority conferred upon the Board of County Commissioners and the Board of Public Instruction of Pasco County, or either of them, to compromise county, school and district taxes that have been levied and assessed and are past due, it was error to deny the motion of the Comptroller to dismis's the bill of complaint seeking relief as stated in the prayer of such bill as quoted.”

This quote states the core legal principle and the reason for reversal.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Pasco County and its Board of Public Instruction sought court approval for a compromise settlement of assessed and past-due county, school, and distri…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. —

Per Curiam. —

The appeal herein was, upon severance allowed, taken by the Comptroller of the State of Florida, from an order denying a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint and amendments thereto, in which bill it in effect is1 alleged that a compromise settlement of assessed and past due county, school and district taxes has been agreed on by the county boards and taxpayers, the prayer of the bill of *751complaint being that the Circuit Court “make and enter its order allowing, providing, ratifying and confirming the respective compromise settlement as hereonabove particularly set forth, and adjudging that when said payment for settlement is made and received by the plaintiffs that such payment will constitute full payment and satisfaction of all taxes due unto the plaintiffs by the respective defendant Railroad Companies for the years 1934, 1935, 1936 and 1937, and upon said settlement being made, that the Defendant J. M. Lee and all public officers and officials acting by, through or under him be prevented, restrained, and enjoined from issuing any warrants or taking any steps by legal process or otherwise for the collection of any further taxes levied and assessed for the various county and school purposes by the plaintiff County as hereinabove particularly set forth for the respective years hereinabove set forth.”

In the absence of valid statutory authority conferred upon the Board of County Commissioners and the Board of Public Instruction of Pasco County, or either of them, to compromise county, school and district taxes that have been levied and assessed and are past due, it was error to deny the motion of the Comptroller to dismis's the bill of complaint seeking relief as stated in the prayer of such bill as quoted.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Terrell, C. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justices Buford and Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw