BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
v.
PEABODY COAL CO. ET AL.; BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY V. BELLAIRE CORP. ET AL.; AND HOLLAND ET AL. V. BELLAIRE CORP. ET AL.
BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
PEABODY COAL CO. ET AL.; BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY V. BELLAIRE CORP. ET AL.; AND HOLLAND ET AL. V. BELLAIRE CORP. ET AL.
534 U.S. 1112
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51 (U.S. 2002)…197 Ill. 2d 112, 757 N. E. 2d 75 (2001). The court’s decision added to a split of authority on this precise issue arising from lawsuits against, among a few others, this particular respondent and its corporate subsidiaries.3 We granted certiorari, 534 U. S. 1112 (2002), to decide whether the FBSA pre-empts state common-law claims of [*56] this character.4 Because the pre-emption defense raises a threshold issue, we have no occasion to consider the merits of petitioner’s claims, or even whether the claims ar…
-
Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co., 537 U.S. 149 (U.S. 2003)…v. Massanari, 14 Fed. Appx. 393 (2001), and Bellaire Corp. v. Massanari, 14 Fed. Appx. 424 (2001)—but conflicting with the Fourth Circuit’s holding in Holland v. Pardee Coal Co., 269 F. 3d 424 (2001). We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict,5 534 U. S. 1112 (2002), and now reverse. III It misses the point simply to argue that the October 1, 1993, date was “mandatory,” “imperative,” or a “deadline,” as of course it was, however unrealistic the mandate may have been. The Commissioner had no discretion…
-
Utah v. Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (U.S. 2002)…results. North Carolina intervened. The District Court found in the Census Bureau’s favor. 182 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (Utah 2001). Utah appealed. 28 U. S. C. § 1253. And we postponed consideration of jurisdiction pending hearing , the case on the merits. 534 U. S. 1112 (2002). II North Carolina argues at the outset that the federal courts lack the constitutional power to hear this case. Article III, § 2, of the Constitution extends the “judicial Power” of the United States to actual “Cases” and “Controversies.”…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence