BROWN

v.

MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• Washington v. State, 835 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 2002)
  …ncluded that Washington had been improperly sentenced as a habitual vio [*1091] lent felony offender and that the trial court improperly entered two written judgments of conviction. . See Hall v. Moore, 792 So. 2d 447, 450 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1136, 122 S.Ct. 1082, 151 L.Ed.2d 982 (2002). . The United States Supreme Court in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, -, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 2443, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), recently held unconstitutional the Arizona capital sentencing statute "to the extent that…
• In re Henry, 757 F.3d 1151 (11th Cir. 2014)
  …l v. State, 742 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1999) (per curiam). The Florida Supreme Court also denied his habeas corpus petition, Hall v. Moore, 792 So. 2d 447 (Fla.2001) (per curiam), and the Supreme Court denied cer-tiorari in February 2002, Hall v. Moore, 534 U.S. 1136, 122 S.Ct. 1082, 151 L.Ed.2d 982 (2002). . I read the Supreme Court's decision in Hall as being more substantive than procedural because it expands the class of persons who are categorically ineligible for the death penalty. This is another reason t…
• Wilson v. Sargent, 313 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2002)
  …f a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.’ ” Hubbard v. Haley, 262 F. 3d 1194, 1197 (11th Cir.2001) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1136, 122 S.Ct. 1083, 151 L.Ed.2d 983 (2002). Nevertheless, the PLRA provides that “[i]n no event shall a prisoner be prohibited from bringing a civil action or appealing a civil or criminal judgment for the reason that the prisoner has no assets and no…