MURPHY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wright, 392 F.3d 1269 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …922(g). 124 F. 3d 1265 (11th Cir.1997). Moreover, we have consistently upheld the validity of this statute. See e.g., United States v. Dunn, 345 F. 3d 1285, 1297 (11th Cir.2003); United States v. Scott, 263 F. 3d 1270 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1166, 122 S.Ct. 1182, 152 L.Ed.2d 124 (2002); United States v. Dupree, 258 F. 3d 1258 (11th Cir.2001). We will not and moreover cannot upset our prior precedent. “[O]nly the Supreme Court or this Court sitting en banc can judicially overrule a prior pane…
• United States v. Dunn, 345 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …ision in McAllister, upholding the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), under Congress’ Commerce Clause power.” (citing United States v. McAllister, 77 F. 3d 387, 390 (11th Cir.1996))) (other citations omitted), cert. denied 534 U.S. 1166, 122 S.Ct. 1182, 152 L.Ed.2d 124 (2002). This conclusion is consistent with those reached by other circuits. See United States v. Stuckey, 255 F. 3d 528, 530 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1011, 122 S.Ct. 498, 151 L.Ed.2d 409 (2001); United St…
• United States v. Draper Pritchett, 327 F.3d 1183 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …this appeal. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW This court reviews the constitutionality of statutes de novo. United States v. Scott, 263 F. 3d 1270, 1271 (11th Cir.2001) (citing United States v. Reynolds, 215 F. 3d 1210, 1212 (11th Cir.2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1166, 122 S.Ct. 1182, 152 L.Ed.2d 124 (2002). III. ANALYSIS The thrust of Pritchett’s argument is that § 922(j) is unconstitutional because the Commerce Clause requires more than a minimal nexus between the matter regulated and interstate commerce. Pr…