BRADLEY

v.

DONER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, 537 U.S. 101 (U.S. 2003)
  …A. 2d 1063 (1993), the court concluded that neither the Double Jeopardy Clause nor the Due Process Clause barred Pennsylvania from seeking the death penalty at petitioner’s retrial. 563 Pa., at 545-551, 763 A. 2d, at 366-369. We granted certiorari. 535 U. S. 926 (2002). [*106] II A The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment commands that “[n]o person shall ... be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” Under this Clause, once a defendant is placed in jeopardy for…
• United States v. Hasner, 340 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …among states and countries, are instrumentalities of interstate commerce, notwithstanding the fact that they also deliver mailings intrastate); United States v. Photogram-metric Data Servs., Inc., 259 F. 3d 229, 249-52 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 926, 122 S.Ct. 1295, 152 L.Ed.2d 208 (2002) (concluding that private and commercial interstate carriers are instrumen-talities of interstate commerce, which Congress can regulate and protect from harm, even where the conduct at issue was intrastate). A…
• United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr., M.D., 344 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …togrammetric Data Servs., Inc., 259 F. 3d 229, 249-52 (4th Cir.2001) (upholding the constitutionality of the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, as applied to intrastate mailing placed with private or commercial interstate carriers), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 926, 122 S.Ct. 1295, 152 L.Ed.2d 208 (2002); United States v. Baker, 82 F. 3d 273, 275-76 (8th Cir.1996) (upholding a conviction under the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a) (2000), based on an extortion victim’s use of an automatic teller machine ... that…