HEARD
v.
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
HEARD
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
535 U.S. 958
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Henderson v. Donal Campbell, 353 F.3d 880 (11th Cir. 2003)…correctness by clear and convincing evidence.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(1). The district court’s determination of whether this standard has been met is subject to de novo review. Harrell v. Butterworth, 251 F. 3d 926, 930 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 958, 122 S.Ct. 1367, 152 L.Ed.2d 360 (2002). A district court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. Delaney v. Floridd Dept. of Corrections, 246 F. 3d 1328, 1329 (11th Cir.2001). “Whether a particular claim is subjected to the doctrine of pro…