CATLIN
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 2002-04-01
No. 01-8463
535 U.S. 976 Supreme Court of the United States (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Shotz v. City OF Plantation, 344 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir. 2003)
    …ict court has not abused its discretion when the court has ‘a range of choices’ and the court’s choice ‘does not constitute a clear error of judgment.’ ” Vanderberg v. Donaldson, 259 F. 3d 1321, 1326 (11th Cir.2001) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 976, 122 S.Ct. 1449, 152 L.Ed.2d 391 (2002). “[District courts can decline to exercise [supplemental] jurisdiction ... for a number of valid reasons. Accordingly, ... ‘district courts [should] deal with cases involving pendent claims in the manner that…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw