PEREZ-HERNANDEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Raphael R. Levy, 391 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …Court’s procedural rules. See United States v. Ardley, 273 F. 3d 991 (11th Cir.2001) (denying rehearing en banc and explaining why Defendant’s Apprendi claim was procedurally barred) (Carnes, J., concurring), cert. denied, Ardley v. United States, 535 U.S. 979, 122 S.Ct. 1457, 152 L.Ed.2d 397 (2002). As in Ardley, there are two rules at issue in Levy’s case: (1) the rule that Supreme Court decisions are to be retroactively applied to cases on direct review; and (2) the procedural rule that entirely new c…
• United States v. Smith, 416 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …such routine remands other than the direction that we take another look at the case because of the new decision.” United States v. Ardley, 273 F. 3d 991, 994 (11th Cir.2001) (Carnes, J„ concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 979, 122 S.Ct. 1457, 152 L.Ed.2d 397 (2002). . See also Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987). In Griffith, the Supreme Court concluded that "a new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retro…
• Jett v. Wash. Cnty. Sch. Bd., 536 U.S. 982 (U.S. 2002)
  …. No. 01-9482. No. 01-9506. No. 01-9555. No. 01-9613. No. 01-9626. No. 01-9658. No. 01-9672. No. 01-9713. No. 01-9774. No. 01-9783. No. 01-9839. No. 01-9842. No. 01-9864. No. 01-9886. No. 01-9898. No. 01-9906. No. 01-9922. No. 01-9949. No. 01-10060. 535 U. S. 979; 535 U. S. 1002; 535 U. S. 1080; ante, p. 925; 535 U. S. 1084; ante, p. 942; ante, p. 964; 535 U. S. 1033; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 908; ante, p. 909; ante, p. 926; ante, p. 927; 535 U. S. 1087; ante, p. 928; ante, p. 910; 535 U. S. 1089; ante, p. 938…