HILLSIDE DAIRY INC. ET AL.
v.
LYONS, SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, ET AL.; AND PONDEROSA DAIRY ET AL. V. LYONS, SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, ET AL.
HILLSIDE DAIRY INC. ET AL.
LYONS, SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, ET AL.; AND PONDEROSA DAIRY ET AL. V. LYONS, SECRETARY, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, ET AL.
535 U.S. 985
Supreme Court of the United States (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (U.S. 2003)…ening its former selling power as an advertising agent for its goods or services.” Id., at 461 (emphasis added). Because other Circuits have also expressed differing views about the “actual harm” issue, we granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 535 U. S. 985 (2002). II Traditional trademark infringement law is a part of the broader law of unfair competition, see Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf, 240 U. S. 403, 413 (1916), that has its sources in English common law, and was largely codified in the T…