NATIONAL CONTAINER CORPORATION, ET AL.,
v.
STATE EX REL JAMES R. STOCKTON, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court denied a motion for intervention by citizens and taxpayers seeking to join a suit against a pulp mill operating in Jacksonville. The Court held that while it has no procedural authority to grant intervention at the appellate stage, the intervenors were not barred by laches and could pursue their claims through a separate suit in the trial court.
The Florida Supreme Court held that it lacks procedural authority to permit intervention at the present stage of the appellate proceeding. However, the Court rejected the appellant's laches argument and denied the intervention motion without prejudice, allowing the intervenors to institute a separate suit in the trial court if they so choose.
“this Court under established rules of procedure is not [*837] authorized at the present state of the cause in this Court to pernvt or enter the order of intervention sought herein”
Establishes that the appellate court lacks procedural authority to grant intervention orders at the appellate stage.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceNational Container Corporation operated a pulp mill in Jacksonville, Florida that produced offensive odors affecting nearby residents. On August 20, 1…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nuisance Abatement cases and more on FLexlaw
This cise is before the Court on motion for leave to intervene on the part of Giles J. Patterson, Robert H. Anderson, Inman P. Crútchfield, Charles L. Arnold, and many other citizens, residents arid taxpayers of *836Duval County, Florida, on their own' behalf and on behalf of more than three thousand other citizens of Jacksonville, Florida, members of the Citizens Anti-Stench Association, an' organization for the sole purpose of abating the nuisance to the citizens of the City of Jacksonville caused by the odor of appellant’s pulp mill.
The original suit was filed in the Circuit Court of Duval County on August 20, 1937. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint and the same upon' hearing was on the 30th day of March, 1938, overruled or denied by the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida. On April 9, 1938, an appeal was taken from said interlocutory order returnable 'to this Court on the 8th day of June, 1938, and an examination of the record here shows that the transcript and briefs have been filed on the part of counsel for the respective parties, and the cause is now ready for a hearing by this Court on oral argument of counsel.
It is the contention’ of counsel for the intervenors that this Court has the power or authority to enter an order' of intervention under Section 9 of the Chancery Procedure Act of 1931, while counsel for appellants contend that this Court is without power or authority to enter an order allowing intervention, and cite the case of Whitted v. Abbe, 54 Fla. 669, 45 So. 478, and other authorities. Counsel for appellants further contend that-if the intervenors had a right to intervene, they should have asserted the right within the eight months since suit was filed, and for their failure to act, all of their rights of intervention are barred by laches.
While we cannot agree to this contention based on laches, there is merit to the contention of counsel for appellants that this Court under established rules of procedure is not *837authorized at the present state of the cause in this Court to pernvt or enter the order of intervention sought herein.
The petition for an order of intervention is hereby denied without prejudice on the part of 'the intervenors to institute such a suit as they may be advised in the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida.
It is so ordered.
Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. McNAYR, 23 Fla. Supp. 95 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1964)
-
Am. Mortg. Corp. v. Lord, 109 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959)
Authorities Cited
- Whitted v. Mrs. C. R. Abbe, 54 Fla. 669 (Fla. 1907)