DIMUN INVESTMENT, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
CITIZENS FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF HIALEAH, A UNITED STATES CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-09-22
No. 70-279
Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, TT.
249 So. 2d 63 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiff below from an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss, and dismissing the cause with prejudice. Directions to the lower court clerk with reference to preparation of the record were not filed by the appellant as provided for by Rule 3.6(d) (1) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., with the result that the pleadings essential to a consideration of this appeal have not been brought before this court.

In Morceau v. Meader, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 242, 243, the court said: “Where, as here, an appellant’s points require a consideration of the record which was before the trial judge and where there is a failure to bring such record before the appellate court, the contentions of the appellant cannot be decided by an appellate court.”

“ * * * It is the responsibility and the duty of the appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned as error. Johnson v. Town of Eatonville, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 664; Gleim v. Gleim, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 610; Belfield v. Lochner, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 668. * * *” Conlee Construction Co. v. Cay Construction Co., Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 792, 797.

For the reason stated, the order appealed from is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Latin Am. Benefit Ctr., Inc. v. Raphael Johstoneaux, 257 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …of Jacksonville, Florida v. Grunthal, 39 Fla. 388, 22 So. 685; Conlee Construction Company v. Cay Construction Company, Fla.App.1969, 221 So. 2d 792; Dimun Investment, Inc. v. Citizens Federal Savings and Loan Association of Hialeah, Fla. App. 1970, 249 So. 2d 63. In reviewing the record before this court, we find that the appellant did in fact direct the Clerk of the trial court to include in the record on appeal a copy of the contract sued upon, but that the Clerk was unable to do so because said contrac…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw