ALVES

v.

MATESANZ, SUPERINTENDENT, BAY STATE CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Taylor, 338 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …Id. While the same process is justified here, we note that our sister Circuits have provided persuasive arguments in support of the conclusion stated in the Zinn opinion. See United States v. Paul, 274 F. 3d 155, 167 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1002, 122 S.Ct. 1571, 152 L.Ed.2d 492 (2002) (“Sentencing courts must inevitably use categorical terms to frame the contours of supervised release conditions. Such categorical terms can provide adequate notice of prohibited conduct when there is a commo…
• Jett v. Wash. Cnty. Sch. Bd., 536 U.S. 982 (U.S. 2002)
  …No. 01-9506. No. 01-9555. No. 01-9613. No. 01-9626. No. 01-9658. No. 01-9672. No. 01-9713. No. 01-9774. No. 01-9783. No. 01-9839. No. 01-9842. No. 01-9864. No. 01-9886. No. 01-9898. No. 01-9906. No. 01-9922. No. 01-9949. No. 01-10060. 535 U. S. 979; 535 U. S. 1002; 535 U. S. 1080; ante, p. 925; 535 U. S. 1084; ante, p. 942; ante, p. 964; 535 U. S. 1033; ante, p. 907; ante, p. 908; ante, p. 909; ante, p. 926; ante, p. 927; 535 U. S. 1087; ante, p. 928; ante, p. 910; 535 U. S. 1089; ante, p. 938; ante, p. 946;…