BAKKEN

v.

LEWIS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Hernandez-Alberto v. State, 889 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 2004)
  …after the trial court permitted him to proceed pro se. We have repeatedly held that “[t]he denial of a motion for continuance is committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge.” Lebron v. State, 799 So. 2d 997, 1018 (Fla. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1036, 122 S.Ct. 1794, 152 L.Ed.2d 652 (2002). A “court’s ruling on a motion for continuance will only be reversed when an abuse of discretion is shown. An abuse of discretion is generally not found unless the court’s ruling on the continuance results in…
• Jones v. State, 872 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
  …the title.”). . See Lebron v. State, 799 So. 2d 997, 1019 (Fla.2001) (“While this Court has held that a defendant can waive ex post facto protections [*943] as part of an agreed-upon bargain by both parties ....”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1036, 122 S.Ct. 1794, 152 L.Ed.2d 652 (2002); Bowles v. Singletary, 698 So. 2d 1201 (Fla.1997). . See Shelton v. State, 739 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Cheney v. State, 640 So. 2d 103, 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Dyer v. State, 629 So. 2d 285, 286 (Fl…
• State v. Jones, 849 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …e concomitant federal constitutional right.1 However, we find the reasoning of the Ash Court persuasive and perceive no intent that the Counsel Clause should be treated differently. See Lebron v. State, 799 So. 2d 997, 1011 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1036, 122 S.Ct. 1794, 152 L.Ed.2d 652 (2002). In explaining the Ash decision, the Court stated: Although we have extended an accused’s right to counsel to certain ‘critical’ pretrial proceedings, we have done so recognizing that at those proceedings, ‘t…