POPICK

v.

MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Carl M. Drury, Jr., M.D., 344 F.3d 1089 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …to interstate commerce would do as much to ‘completely obliterate’ the distinction between national and local authority as if no jurisdictional requirement existed at all.” United States v. Odom, 252 F. 3d 1289, 1296 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1058, 122 S.Ct. 1920, 152 L.Ed.2d 828 (2002). . As noted in Part 11(A), supra, the Comprehensive Crime Control Act amended the Travel Act and added the murder-for-hire provision. . This disjoint between the legislative history and an expansive interpre…
• Westly Brian Cani v. United States, 331 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …d 459, 462 (11th Cir.1997). However, where an objection to a restitution order is raised for the first time on appeal, it is reviewed only for plain error. See id.; see also United States v. Odom, 252 F. 3d 1289, 1299 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1058, 122 S.Ct. 1920, 152 L.Ed.2d 828 (2002). The underlying rationale is that “[effective appellate review is hindered when the asserted error has not been brought to the district court’s attention.” Davis, 117 F. 3d at 462. This problem is greatly ex…