CHARLES CLIFFORD PARKER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CHARLES CLIFFORD PARKER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
249 So. 2d 477
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971)
Caution
Cited by 29 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Benefield v. State, Fla.1964, 160 So.2d 706; Rodriguez v. State, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 656.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Vance v. Indian Hammock Hunt & Riding Club, Ltd., 403 So. 2d 1367 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)…untary dismissal was that “the court finds from the totality of the credible evidence that the common areas have been properly maintained. . . . . The elements of common law fraud are set forth in Poliakoff v. The National Emblem Insurance Company, 249 So. 2d 477 (Fla.3d DCA 1971), as follows: (1) A false statement of fact; (2) known by the defendant to be false at the time is was made; (3) made for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to act in reliance thereon; (4) action by the plaintiff in reliance on…
-
Hamlen v. Fairchild Indus., Inc., 413 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…the plaintiff in reliance on the correctness of the representation; and (5) resulting damage to the plaintiff. Vance v. Indian Hammock Hunt & Riding Club, 403 So. 2d 1367, 1371, n. 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Co., 249 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), cert. denied, 254 So. 2d 790 (Fla.). Appellant’s pleadings sufficiently allege each of these five points. Fairchild argues that an employer’s false promise to a prospective employee regarding future acts, such as the right to pe…
-
Stoler v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. & Harold Wolf, 287 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…ch' 16, 1973. Appellant contends that dismissal of the complaint was improper because the complaint stated a valid cause of action for misrepresentation. We disagree. Appellant relies on Poliakoff v. National Emblem Insurance Company, Fla.App.1971, 249 So. 2d 477, as authority to support his cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation. In that case, this court held that an action for fraudulent misrepresentation would lie where the plaintiff had purchased a “non-cancellable” policy which was cancelled…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Benefield v. State, 160 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1964)
- Onelio Garcia Rodriquez v. State, 189 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)