MATTEO S. APONE, APPELLANT,
v.
EDNA M. GREEN, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1971-06-18
No. 70-780
PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
249 So. 2d 488 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It undisputedly appears that the notice of appeal here was filed one day late. We are, therefore, without jurisdiction of this appeal. The same must be, and it is hereby, dismissed ex mero motu. See, Ramagli Realty Co. v. Craver (Fla.1960), 121 So.2d 648 and Robberson v. Jefferson (Fla.App.1968), 207 So.2d 467.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …re the notice of appeal is not filed within thirty days of rendition, the appellate court is precluded from exercising jurisdiction over the appeal. See Peltz v. District Court of Appeal, Third Dist., 605 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 1992); Apone v. Green, 249 So. 2d 488, 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971). The determinative issue in this ease centers on the rendition date of the February 23, 1996, order. Tyler argues that his motion for clarification filed February 28, 1996, delayed rendition of the order. However, Tyler’s mo…
  • Hoffman v. Kye S. Hoffman, 463 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
    …o the county courthouse until February 14, 1984, when it was stamped “received.” Thus, if the notice is not deemed “filed” until received at the county seat then the notice of appeal is untimely and this court lacks jurisdiction. See Apone v. Green, 249 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), and Hawks v. Walter, 409 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Apparently, the practice of not considering the notice of appeal filed until receipt at the county seat was adopted in order to comply with the Florida Constitution, Artic…
  • MML Dev. Corp. v. Eagle Nat'l Bank OF Miami, 603 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
    …se, there is no charge that, the plaintiff was guilty of any wrongdoings naming the defendants who were bona fide residents of Volusia County and were dismissed upon accord and satisfaction.’ ” Vance, 444 So. 2d at 1164, quoting Iseminger v. Morris, 249 So. 2d 488, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). The court also found preeminently significant that the statutory language of sections 47.011 and 47.021, Florida Statutes (1981), specifically refer to the venue privilege as attaching when the action is “begun” or “brough…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw