JONES

v.

ANDERSON, SUPERINTENDENT, CRAGGY CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Citator

Cited By

• Carr v. Schofield, 364 F.3d 1246 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …view Our review of a state court’s judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding is governed by a “highly deferential standard of review for factual determinations made by a state court.” Fugate v. Head, 261 F. 3d 1206, 1215 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1104, 122 S.Ct. 2310, 152 L.Ed.2d 1065 (2002). The state court’s determinations are “presumed to be correct” and the applicant bears “the burden of rebutting the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.” Id. (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 225…
• Swoyer v. Kercher, 536 U.S. 976 (U.S. 2002)
  …-9475. No. 01-9502. No. 01-9507. No. 01-9532. No. 01-9566. No. 01-9567. No. 01-9619. No. 01-9624. No. 01-9663. No. 01-9682. No. 01-9731. No. 01-9819. No. 01-9832. No. 01-9884. No. 01-10013. No. 01-10094. No. 01-10166. 535 U. S. 1116; 535 U. S. 1067; 535 U. S. 1104; ante, p. 907; 535 U. S. 1069; 535 U. S. 1069; 535 U. S. 1070; ante, p. 925; 535 U. S. 1071; 535 U. S. 1086; ante, p. 910; ante, p. 920; 535 U. S. 1087; ante, p. 930; 535 U. S. 1106; 535 U. S. 1090; 535 U. S. 1107; ante, p. 911; ante, p. 913; and an…