MATTHEWS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Carter v. State, 919 So. 2d 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …We conclude that the remaining claims were also properly denied as they were either without merit or the defendant failed to demonstrate or even allege prejudice. See United, States v. Novaton, 271 F. 3d 968, 1010-1011 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1120, 122 S.Ct. 2345, 153 L.Ed.2d 173 (2002); Herring v. State, 730 So. 2d 1264, 1267 (Fla.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1003, 119 S.Ct. 2337, 144 L.Ed.2d 235 (1999); Williams v. State, 534 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Affirmed.…
• United States v. Ettinger, 344 F.3d 1149 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …ger must “make a factual showing of inconsistent interests” or point to “specific instances in the record” to suggest that an actual impairment of his interests exists. United States v. Novaton, 271 F. 3d 968, 1010-11 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1120, 122 S.Ct. 2345, 153 L.Ed.2d 173 (2002). Ettinger fails to show that an actual conflict of interest existed. In actuality, Et-tinger concedes that only a potential conflict existed because of the likelihood that defense counsel would be called to…