JAMES BUMGARNER, APPELLANT,

v.

COMMUNIST STYLED TYPE OFFICIALS ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Dorse v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 513 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1987)
  …rally, a contractor is not a true agent where the principal controls only the outcome of the relationship, not the means used to achieve that outcome. Collins v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Ins. Co., 247 So. 2d 461 (4th DCA), cert. denied, 249 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1971). Moreover, even a true agent himself becomes liable for acts outside the scope of the agency relationship or contrary to the principal’s instructions, whether or not the principal can be sued. Tedder v. Riggin, 65 Fla. 153, 61 So. 244 (19…
• United States Tel. Co. v. State, 410 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …is a principal consideration in determining employment status. Magarian v. Southern Fruit Distributors, 146 Fla. 773, 1 So. 2d 858 (1941); Collins v. Federated Mu tual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co., 247 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 249 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1971); Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Vocelle, 106 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). In the case before us, as in Cosmo Personnel Agency of Fort Lauderdale, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Employment Security, 407 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the co…
• D.O. Creasman Elecs., Inc. v. State of Fla. Dep't of Labor & Emp. Sec., 458 So. 2d 894 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …ion of another as to his results only, he is an independent contractor; if he is subject to control as to the means used, he is an employee. Collins v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co., 247 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 249 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1971). In this case the cable splicers work on their own schedules, and neither the appellant nor the telephone company exercises control over the means by which they perform their services. “(b) Whether or not the one employed is engaged in a…