ESCOBEDO
v.
TEXAS

U.S. | 2002-06-10
No. 01M66
536 U.S. 903 Supreme Court of the United States (2002) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Branch v. Smith, 538 U.S. 254 (U.S. 2003)
    …Court— filed a timely notice of appeal from the District Court and a jurisdictional statement. The federal plaintiffs filed a jurisdictional statement on conditional cross-appeal. We noted probable jurisdiction in both appeals and consolidated them. 536 U. S. 903 (2002). II At the outset we should observe two critical distinctions between these cases and the one that was before us in Growe v. Emison, 507 U. S. 25 (1993). In Growe, the Federal District Court had refused to abstain or defer to state-court…
  • Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. 216 (U.S. 2003)
    …e, but also to answer a question that none of those judges reached, namely, whether injunctive relief is available because the small amounts to which they claim they are entitled render recovery through litigation impractical. We granted certiorari. 536 U. S. 903 (2002). III While it confirms the State’s authority to confiscate private property, the text of the Fifth Amendment imposes two conditions on the exercise of such authority: the taking must be for a “public use” and “just compensation” must be pai…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw