RIANO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. State, 852 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …31 So. 2d 93 (Fla.2002). As Anders was a criminal case, we must determine whether it applies to this civil proceeding. Our task is made easier by the opinion of the Florida Supreme Court in Pullen v. State, 802 So. 2d 1113 (Fla.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 915, 122 S.Ct. 2381, 153 L.Ed.2d 199 (2002). There, the Court held that the Anders procedure is to be used in appeals of involuntary civil commitments under the Baker Act, § 394.451-394.4789, Fla. Stat. (2001). In broad terms, the [*435] Baker Act provi…
• Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (U.S. 2011)
  …view might be informed by First Amendment considerations. But regulatory actions of the kind present here have not previously been thought to raise serious additional constitutional concerns under the First Amendment. But cf. Trans Union LLC v. FTC, 536 U. S. 915 (2002) (Kennedy, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (questioning ban on use of consumer credit reports for target marketing). The ease with which one can point to actual or hypothetical examples with potentially adverse speech-related effects…