HENDERSON

v.

GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• League of United Latin Am. Citizens v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (U.S. 2006)
  …ng scheme, resulting in litigation and the necessity of a court-ordered plan to comply with the Constitution’s one-person, one-vote requirement. See Balderas v. Texas, Civ. Action No. 6:01CV158 (ED Tex., Nov. 14, 2001) (per curiam), summarily aff'd, 536 U. S. 919 (2002), App. E to Juris. Statement in No. 05-276, p. 202a (hereinafter Balderas, App. E to [*412] Juris. Statement). The congressional districting map resulting from the Balderas litigation is known as Plan 1151C. As we have said, two members of…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Perry v. Perez, 565 U.S. 388 (U.S. 2012)
  …proclaiming its ability to draw an interim map “without regard to political considerations,” the District Court relied heavily on Balderas v. Texas, No. 6:01cvl58, 2001 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 25740 (ED Tex., Nov. 14, 2001) (per curiam), summarily aff’d, 536 U. S. 919 (2002). 1 App. 182. But in Bald-eras there was no recently enacted state plan to which the District Court could turn. Without the benefit of legislative guidance in making distinctly legislative policy judgments, the Balderas court was perhaps compe…