STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

THOMAS BRUCE REESE, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Plaza Materials Corp., 908 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 2005)
  …ommon law bond by examining the document for reference to the statutory provision and applicable notice obligation and time limitation or the provision of coverage in excess of statutory limits. Compare United Bonding Ins. Co. v. City of Holly Hill, 249 So. 2d 720, 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971) (deeming bond a common law bond because the document failed to reference section 255.05 and applicable time limitation and provided coverage in excess of that required by the statute); S.W. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist. ex rel. The…
• Sw. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Miller Constr. Co., 355 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
  …Florida Statutes (1975). Moreover, ambiguities in the form of such a bond must be construed in favor of granting the broadest possible coverage to those intended to be benefited by its protection. United Bonding Insurance Co. v. City of Holly Hill, 249 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). The bond furnished SWFWMD by Miller and American referred to the construction agreement; however, the bond did not provide that it was furnished pursuant to the statutory requirements for bonds on public works projects, nor did…
• United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. N. Am. Steel Corp., 335 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)
  ….05, Fla.Stat. The trial court specifically held that the bond was not a statutory bond under the statute but was a common law bond. This holding was based on the decision in United Bonding Insurance Company v. City of Holly Hill, Fla.App.1st 1971, 249 So. 2d 720. We affirm the trial court in its decision on this question and the denial of the motion. The motion for more definite statement or compulsory amendment and the motion for change of venue were also denied by the trial court and we affirm the trial…

Authorities Cited

• City OF Clearwater v. Caldwell, 67 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1953)