ROBERT L. WHITE, APPELLANT,
v.
ETTA L. WHITE, APPELLEE
ROBERT L. WHITE, APPELLANT,
ETTA L. WHITE, APPELLEE
249 So. 2d 729
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment of divorce. In divorce matters the chancellor has broad discretion and his judgment comes to us clothed in a presumption of correctness. Unless there is a showing of abuse of discretion the judgment will be affirmed.
We have studied the record, the briefs and other matters filed in this cause and no reversible error being shown the judgment is therefore affirmed.
PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Canal Auth. of the State of Fla. v. Ocala Mfg., 332 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1976)…re insufficient to state a cause for relief, where evidence advanced at hearings on pretrial motions indicated that Ocala might be entitled to relief, the complaint should not have been dismissed without giving the plaintiff an opportunity to amend. 249 So. 2d 729 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1971). We return to the Marion County eminent domain proceeding (Case # 69-203). There the trial judge refused to approve the condemnation of the fee simple title to all but approximately 500 acres; instead, in regard to Parcel No. 1…
-
West v. West, 260 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)…. In divorce matters, the chancellor has broad discretion and his judgment comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness. Such a judgment will be affirmed unless there is a showing of an abuse of discretion. White v. White, 249 So. 2d 729 (Fla.App.2nd, 1971). We have carefully examined the record on appeal and have considered the briefs and oral arguments submitted by the parties, and our conclusion is that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed herein is the…
-
Preston v. Preston, 333 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)…e alimony of $200 per month from October 1, 1976, through March 1, 1977. The parties agree on the law of the case and the necessity of the husband to show an abuse of the trial court’s discretion as a predicate for appellate relief, White v. White, 249 So. 2d 729 (2d Fla.App.1971). The issues have to do with the facts. Very shortly and simply, the husband was a dentist and the parties had lived beyond their means during their ten year marriage, so that at the time of the dissolution they had, without disput…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence