HARROD

v.

ARIZONA

Citator

Cited By

• Salvato v. Deputy Lauren Miley, 790 F.3d 1286 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …the decision and the decision’s basis before a court can hold the government liable on a ratification theory.” Thomas ex rel. Thomas v. Roberts, 261 F. 3d 1160, 1174 n. 12 (11th Cir.2001), cert. granted, judgment vacated sub nom. Thomas v. Roberts, 536 U.S. 953, 122 S.Ct. 2653, 153 L.Ed.2d 829 (2002), opinion reinstated, 323 F. 3d 950 (11th Cir.2003). Only when “the authorized policymakers approve a subordinate’s decision and the basis for it” have they “ratifi[ed]” that “decision.” Praprotnik, 485 U.S.…
• Vaughan v. COX, 343 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …wrence Cox was entitled to summary judgment as to his qualified immunity defense on Jerry Charges Vaughan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims arising out of injuries Vaughan suffered during a police chase. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, Vaughan v. Cox, 536 U.S. 953, 122 S.Ct. 2653, 153 L.Ed.2d 830 (2002), vacated our judgment, and remanded this action for reconsideration in light of the Court’s intervening decision in Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730, 122 S.Ct. 2508, 153 L.Ed.2d 666 (2002). Following the filing of…
• Thomas v. R.G. Roberts, 323 F.3d 950 (11th Cir. 2003)
  …he district court’s denial of declaratory and injunctive relief. Id. The Supreme Court vacated our prior judgment and remanded the case, instructing us to reconsider the judgment in light of the Court’s decision in Hope v. Pelzer. Thomas v. Roberts, 536 U.S. 953, 122 S.Ct. 2653, 153 L.Ed.2d 829 (2002). We asked the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the issue on remand. All parties have done so. Having considered both the briefs and Hope, we conclude that Hope does not dictate a change in the o…