HOLLADAY

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• Clay v. United States, 537 U.S. 522 (U.S. 2003)
  …lowing affirmance of their convictions, §2255’s one-year limitation period begins to run when the defendant’s time for seeking review by this Court expires.1 To secure uniformity in the application of § 2255’s time constraint, we granted certiorari, 536 U. S. 957 (2002), and now reverse the Seventh Circuit’s judgment.2 [*527] II Finality is variously defined; like many legal terms, its precise meaning depends on context. Typically, a federal judgment becomes final for appellate review and claim preclusion p…
• United States v. Bennett, 368 F.3d 1343 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …ivity as to be irrelevant. Nor does the four-month lapse undercut the probative value of the prior acts in establishing motive, opportunity, intent, and knowledge. See United States v. Dickerson, 248 F. 3d 1036, 1047 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 957, 122 S.Ct. 2659, 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002). The district judge did not err in denying the motion in limine. MOTION TO SEVER Bennett moved to sever trial on the count charging him as a convicted felon in possession of firearms from trial on the remain…